I rankle whenever I hear the term, “successful aging,” which has become the Boomers’ mantra. I take issue because it implies there is a right and wrong way to age. Successful aging is defined in terms of a self-centered wellness regime as opposed to a compassionate focus on the elder’s wisdom years, where giving back to society provides meaning late in life.
I was heartened to discover an ally in Barbara Ehrenreich’s book, Natural Causes: An Epidemic of Wellness, The Uncertainty of Dying and Killing Ourselves to Live Longer.
Ehrenreich maintains that many older Americans are stressed-out in their allegiance to “successful aging,” where old age becomes a battle to keep death at bay as long as possible.
Death is viewed as a disease as opposed to a normal stage in the life cycle. “Successful aging” reflects an inability to accept death, what the writer Stephen Jenkinson terms our “death phobia.”
This adversarial relationship with death advances a wellness regime as the solution to longevity. To live longer older Americans are ingesting mega vitamins, eating bland “healthy” food, exercising like mad and succumbing to unnecessary tests pushed by our for-profit medical profession.
Ehrenreich challenges standard medical practices, like routine tests for mammograms and bone density, insisting there is little proof for the efficacy of routine screenings which can raise alarm unnecessarily.
When a bone density test revealed that she had osteopenia or minimal bone loss, Ehrenreich’s reaction was, “What woman over 70 doesn’t have bone loss?” She takes aim at the pharmaceutical industry that profits from early detection, frequently peddling drugs with questionable results. Fosamax, commonly prescribed for bone density, has been found to have serious side effects, including the possibility of fractures!
Ehrenreich opted to spend her ‘70’s and ‘80’s at her desk writing or taking a long walk as opposed to countless hours in a windowless doctor’s waiting room. She led a healthy life, working out regularly, eating healthy foods, but never to the point of depriving herself of favorite foods like butter, commenting, “What’s the point of toast without butter?”
With a Ph. D in cellular immunology Ehrenreich takes aim at the popular concept that positive thinking can defeat bad cells and that the right mindset can defeat our biology. She makes the case that cells, and subatomic particles don’t have personalities; they go their own way regardless of how we react.
I was reminded of a friend who, after being diagnosed with breast cancer attended a support group where she was encouraged to imagine friendly warrior cells attacking her cancer cells. When this didn’t prove effective, she confessed to feeling like a failure.
In an interview with Slate to promote her book Ehrenreich suggested that the obsession with successful aging carries a strong level of narcissism. She told the interviewer: “It’s all about controlling what’s within the perimeter of your skin. It’s not about actually doing anything in the world or with other people.”
While Ehrenreich doesn’t address the spiritual component to aging, A spiritual outlook is often what makes later life meaningful through deepening one’s connections to family and friends and sharing one’s accumulated wisdom to participate in social causes addressed to the less fortunate, or to mentor young adults.
Successful aging is another benchmark that divides the privileged from the poor. It takes money to afford a gym membership, expensive organic foods, vitamins, and medical screening procedures often not covered by insurance.
Pondering the campaign to outwit death Ehrenreich writes:
You can think of death bitterly and with resignation . . . and take every possible measure to postpone it. Or, more realistically, you can think of life as an interruption of an eternity of personal nonexistence and see it as an opportunity to observe and interact with the living, ever surprising world around us.